Arthroscopic SLAP IIb repair using knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors: is there a difference?
ESSKA Academy. de SA D. 05/09/18; 212163; P21-1357 Topic: Arthroscopic Surgery
Dr. Darren de SA
Dr. Darren de SA
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.

You can access free regular educational content on the ESSKA Academy by registering as an 'ESSKA Academy User’ here

Access to Premium content is currently a membership benefit.

Click here to join ESSKA or renew your membership.
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)
Objectives: SLAP IIb surgical outcomes have traditionally been less predictable when compared to other shoulder injuries. Traditional knotted anchors may partially be to blame by abrading the rotator cuff leading to tearing and pain.

Methods: Seventy-four athletes who underwent arthroscopic SLAP IIb repair with traditional (n=42) and knotless anchors (n=32) at minimum 2-year follow-up were evaluated. Demographic, surgical data, return to play (RTP), KJOC, ASES, stability, ROM, strength, and pain scores were compared. Fisher's Exact Test, Kruskal-Wallis Test, and Exact Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test were done where appropriate.

Results: Knotless anchors had slightly higher RTP (93.5%, 58.1% same level) vs. traditional (90.2%, 53.7% same level), but was not statistically significant. Knotless anchors were less likely to require revision surgery (9%) compared to traditional anchors (17%), but was not statistically significant. There was no difference in KJOC (66.1 vs. 65.6), ASES (86.3 vs. 85.3), stability, ROM, strength, and pain scores between knotless and traditional anchors (p > 0.05). Pain was the only variable linked to decreased RTP (p < 0.0001). Younger patients had significantly poorer KJOC (p = 0.02) and ASES scores (p = 0.02) but no difference in RTP. No difference in outcome measures or RTP was found with gender, age, overhead athletes, number of anchors, or sport type (p > 0.05). Average follow-up was 6.5 years.

Conclusions: Knotless anchors required less revision surgery, had higher RTP, ASES, and KJOC scores; however, statistical significance was not achieved in this relatively small cohort. Further patient evaluation, such as case matching, should be done to eliminate other confounders. Possible other advantages such as tensioning and surgical time may also be important when considering lower profile knotless fixation.

Keywords:
SLAP IIb, knotless anchor
Objectives: SLAP IIb surgical outcomes have traditionally been less predictable when compared to other shoulder injuries. Traditional knotted anchors may partially be to blame by abrading the rotator cuff leading to tearing and pain.

Methods: Seventy-four athletes who underwent arthroscopic SLAP IIb repair with traditional (n=42) and knotless anchors (n=32) at minimum 2-year follow-up were evaluated. Demographic, surgical data, return to play (RTP), KJOC, ASES, stability, ROM, strength, and pain scores were compared. Fisher's Exact Test, Kruskal-Wallis Test, and Exact Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test were done where appropriate.

Results: Knotless anchors had slightly higher RTP (93.5%, 58.1% same level) vs. traditional (90.2%, 53.7% same level), but was not statistically significant. Knotless anchors were less likely to require revision surgery (9%) compared to traditional anchors (17%), but was not statistically significant. There was no difference in KJOC (66.1 vs. 65.6), ASES (86.3 vs. 85.3), stability, ROM, strength, and pain scores between knotless and traditional anchors (p > 0.05). Pain was the only variable linked to decreased RTP (p < 0.0001). Younger patients had significantly poorer KJOC (p = 0.02) and ASES scores (p = 0.02) but no difference in RTP. No difference in outcome measures or RTP was found with gender, age, overhead athletes, number of anchors, or sport type (p > 0.05). Average follow-up was 6.5 years.

Conclusions: Knotless anchors required less revision surgery, had higher RTP, ASES, and KJOC scores; however, statistical significance was not achieved in this relatively small cohort. Further patient evaluation, such as case matching, should be done to eliminate other confounders. Possible other advantages such as tensioning and surgical time may also be important when considering lower profile knotless fixation.

Keywords:
SLAP IIb, knotless anchor
Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies