Superior knee flexor strength at 2 years with all-inside short-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs a conventional hamstring technique
ESSKA Academy. KOULOUMENTAS P. 11/08/19; 286393
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)
Superior knee flexor strength at 2 years with all-inside short-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs a conventional hamstring technique

ESMA Free Papers

Topic: Sports Trauma

Kouloumentas P.1,2, Kavroudakis E.1, Charalampidis E.1, Triantafyllopoulos G.1, Tsekouras I.3, Kavroudakis D.4
1Metropolitan Hospital, Clinic for Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Athens, Greece, 2Athens Sports Orthopaedics, Clinic for Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Athens, Greece, 3Charokopeion University, Athens, Greece, 4Univesity of Aegean, Geography, Mitilene, Greece

Purpose: To compare the "all-inside technique" for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a short, quadrupled semitendinosus tendon (ST4) autograft and suspensory cortical fixation on both the femoral and tibial side vs the "conventional technique" using a semitendinosus/gracilis (ST/G) autograft fixed with a suspensory device on the femoral side and with an interference screw on the tibial side, in terms of clinical and functional outcomes.
Methods: A total of 90 patients were enrolled, randomised into two groups, and prospectively followed. Group A comprised 45 patients treated with the all-inside technique and Group B included 45 patients treated with the conventional ACL technique (55 males, 35 females; mean age 28.7 ± 11.3 years). Patients completed the Lysholm knee score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS), and the Knee Society Score (KSS) preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Anterior tibial translation measurement (KT-1000 arthrometer) and isokinetic testing of the operative vs non-operative limb were also conducted and the limb symmetry index (LSI) was determined.
Results: At 24 months, the Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS, and KSS scores between the two groups were similar (n.s.). Anterior tibial translation between the operative and non-operative knee was also similar among the two groups (n.s.). Patients of Group A had significantly higher mean LSIs in terms of flexor peak torque (1.0 ± 0.1 vs 0.9 ± 0.1; p <  0.001), time-to-peak (0.9 ± 0.1 vs 0.8 ± 0.1; p <  0.001) and total work (0.9 ± 0.1 vs 0.8 ± 0.1; p <  0.001) at 180°/s, and significantly better mean LSI for isometric flexor/extensor ratio at 90° (1.1 ± 0.3 vs 0.8 ± 0.2; p <  0.001).
Conclusion: The all-inside ACL reconstruction with an ST4 autograft and cortical button fixation on both ends is a viable alternative to the conventional technique. It affords preservation of knee flexor strength, which is of advantage, especially when treating athletes with ACL injury.

Level of Evidence: I.
Superior knee flexor strength at 2 years with all-inside short-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs a conventional hamstring technique

ESMA Free Papers

Topic: Sports Trauma

Kouloumentas P.1,2, Kavroudakis E.1, Charalampidis E.1, Triantafyllopoulos G.1, Tsekouras I.3, Kavroudakis D.4
1Metropolitan Hospital, Clinic for Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Athens, Greece, 2Athens Sports Orthopaedics, Clinic for Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Athens, Greece, 3Charokopeion University, Athens, Greece, 4Univesity of Aegean, Geography, Mitilene, Greece

Purpose: To compare the "all-inside technique" for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a short, quadrupled semitendinosus tendon (ST4) autograft and suspensory cortical fixation on both the femoral and tibial side vs the "conventional technique" using a semitendinosus/gracilis (ST/G) autograft fixed with a suspensory device on the femoral side and with an interference screw on the tibial side, in terms of clinical and functional outcomes.
Methods: A total of 90 patients were enrolled, randomised into two groups, and prospectively followed. Group A comprised 45 patients treated with the all-inside technique and Group B included 45 patients treated with the conventional ACL technique (55 males, 35 females; mean age 28.7 ± 11.3 years). Patients completed the Lysholm knee score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS), and the Knee Society Score (KSS) preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Anterior tibial translation measurement (KT-1000 arthrometer) and isokinetic testing of the operative vs non-operative limb were also conducted and the limb symmetry index (LSI) was determined.
Results: At 24 months, the Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS, and KSS scores between the two groups were similar (n.s.). Anterior tibial translation between the operative and non-operative knee was also similar among the two groups (n.s.). Patients of Group A had significantly higher mean LSIs in terms of flexor peak torque (1.0 ± 0.1 vs 0.9 ± 0.1; p <  0.001), time-to-peak (0.9 ± 0.1 vs 0.8 ± 0.1; p <  0.001) and total work (0.9 ± 0.1 vs 0.8 ± 0.1; p <  0.001) at 180°/s, and significantly better mean LSI for isometric flexor/extensor ratio at 90° (1.1 ± 0.3 vs 0.8 ± 0.2; p <  0.001).
Conclusion: The all-inside ACL reconstruction with an ST4 autograft and cortical button fixation on both ends is a viable alternative to the conventional technique. It affords preservation of knee flexor strength, which is of advantage, especially when treating athletes with ACL injury.

Level of Evidence: I.
Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies